|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
What is Political in Sub-politics?How Aristotle Might Help STS
Gerard de Vries
Department of Philosophy, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Nieuwe Doelenstraat 15, 1012 CP Amsterdam, The Netherlands, g.h.devries{at}uva.nl
Recent contributions by Collins, Evans, Jasanoff and Wynne to the discussion of how science and technology studies (STS) might contribute to understanding `subpolitics' — the complex, expert knowledge-intensive and distributed political issues technological societies have to deal with — and involvement of STS scholars in experiments to extend public participation in decision-making about science and technology are shown to be based on an un-reflexive use of an off-the-shelf conception of politics. This conception, grafted on the old model of the sovereign, frames political actors as `mini-kings': as subjects with preferences, interests, aims and plans that they want to be executed. To reveal the limitations of this conception of politics, I confront it with Aristotle's conception of politics. The conception of politics that has guided work in STS is shown to be based on too narrow a conception of political action that fails to properly account for the object of politics. I argue that Aristotle invites us to analyse the object of politics in ways that closely resemble the way in which STS has learned to analyse the object of experimental science. Although Latour comes close to the tasks that an Aristotelian conception of politics suggest, his Politics of Nature shares some of the limitations that trouble other work of STS in the political domain. Despite 25 centuries separating us from his conception of politics, Aristotle may help STS to understand the politics implied in subpolitics.
Key Words: action • democracy • expertise • poiesis • politics • political philosophy • praxis • subpolitics
References
- Ackrill, John L. (1978) `Aristotle on Action', Mind 87(348): 595—601.[Web of Science]
- Akrich, Madeleine (1992) `The De-Scription of Technical Objects', in W.E. Bijker & J. Law (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 205—24.
- Akrich, Madeleine & Bruno Latour (1992) `A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies', in W.E. Bijker & J. Law (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 259—64.
- Anderson, Benedict (1991) Imagined Communities (London: Verso).
- Aristotle (1984a) `Nicomachean Ethics', in J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), Vol. 2: 1094a—1181b23.
- Aristotle (1984b) `Politics', in J. Barnes (ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), Vol. 2: 1252a—1342b.
- Beck, Ulrich (1993) Die Erfindung des Politischen ( Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag).
- Beck, Ulrich, Anthony Giddens& Scott Lash (1994) Reflexive Modernization — Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order (Oxford: Polity Press).
- Bovens, Mark E.A. (1995) De verplaatsing van de politiek ( Amsterdam: Wiardi Beckmann Stichting).
- Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes & Yannick Barthe (2001) Agir dans un monde incertain — Essai sur la démocratie technique (Paris: Éditions du Seuil).
- Cassin, Barbara (ed.) (2004) Vocabulaire Européen des Philosophies (Paris: Le Robert/Seuil).
- Collins, Harry M. & Robert Evans (2002) `The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience', Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235—96.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- De Vries, Gerard (2006) `Prenatale screening. Beperkingen van legitieme politiek en redelijk bestuur' in P.L Meuts, E.K. Schrijvers and G.H. de Vries (eds), Leren van de praktijk (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press: 67—90.
- Dewey, John (1927) The Public and Its Problems ( Athens: Swallow Press — Ohio University Press).
- Freeland, Cynthia A. (1985) `Aristotelian Actions', Noûs 19(3): 397—414.[Web of Science]
- Hagendijk, Rob (2004) `The Public Understanding of Science and Public Participation in Regulated Worlds', Minerva 42: 41—59.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hamlett, Patrick W. (2003) `Technology Theory and Deliberative Democracy', Science, Technology, & Human Values 28(1): 112—40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hobbes, Thomas (1967 [1651]) Leviathan ( Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).
- Jasanoff, Sheila (2003) `Breaking the Waves in Science Studies: Comment on H.M. Collins & Robert Evans, "The Third Wave of Science Studies "', Social Studies of Science 33(3): 389—400.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Joss, S. & J. Durant (eds) (1995) Public Participation in Science — The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe (London: Science Museum).
- Kapuscinski, Ryszard (1989) The Emperor (New York: Vintage International).
- Kymlicka, Will (2002) Contemporary Political Philosophy ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Latour, Bruno (1992) `Where are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts', in W.E. Bijker & J. Law (eds), Shaping Technology/Building Society (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ): 225—58.
- Latour, Bruno (1999) Pandora's Hope — Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
- Latour, Bruno (2004) Politics of Nature — How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
- Lear, Jonathan (1988) Aristotle: The Desire to Understand ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
- MacIntyre, Alisdair (1984) After Virtue (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).
- Misa, Tom, Johan Schot & Arie Rip (1995) Managing Technology in Society: the Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment (London: Pinter).
- Popkema, Markus & Hans Harbers (2005) `The Cultural Politics of Prenatal Screening' in H. Harbers (ed.), Inside the Politics of Technology. Agency and Normativity in the Co-Production of Technology and Society (Amsterdam: Amsterdam Unviersity Press, Amsterdam): 229—256.
- Rowe, Gene, Roy Marsh & Lynn J. Frewer (2004) `Evaluation of a Deliberative Conference', Science, Technology, & Human Values 29(1): 88—121.[Abstract]
- Shapin, Steven & Simon Schaffer (1985) Leviathan and the Air-Pump ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
- Skinner, Quentin (1989) `The State', in T. Ball, J. Farr & R. S. Hanson (eds), Political Innovation and Conceptual Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 90—131
- Tweed Kramer 29323 (2003) `Prenatle screening', Brief van de Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, 21 November 2003 (The Hague: Tweede Kamer der Staten General).
- Toom, Victor & Dymphie Van Berkel (2003) `Deelrapport Maternale Serumscreening.' in M. Kirejczyk (ed.), Ruimte voor rechtvaardigheid (Enschede: Twente University): 83—156.
- Weber, Max (1972) Wirstchaft and Gesellschaft 5th ed. (Tubingen: J.C.B. Mohr)
- Weber, Max (1988) `Politik als Beruf', in M. Weber, Gesammelte Politische Schriften (Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr): 505—60.
- Winner, Langdon (1986) The Whale and the Reactor ( Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
- Wrong, Dennis H. (1979) Power — Its Forms, Bases and Uses (New York: Harper & Row).
- Wynne, Brian (1989) `Sheepfarming after Chernobyl', Environment 31(2): 10—39.
- Wynne, Brian (2003) `Seasick on the Third Wave? Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to Collins & Evans (2002)', Social Studies of Science 33(3): 401—17.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 5,
781-809 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312706070749
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
W. J. Boonstra and B. B. Bock
Fallacies of Virtualization: A Case Study of Farming, Manure, Landscapes, and Dutch Rural Policy
Science Technology Human Values,
July 1, 2009;
34(4):
427 - 448.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Asdal
Subjected to parliament: the laboratory of experimental medicine and the animal body.
Social Studies of Science,
December 1, 2008;
38(6):
899 - 917.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Marres
The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy
Social Studies of Science,
October 1, 2007;
37(5):
759 - 780.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Latour
Turning Around Politics: A Note on Gerard de Vries' Paper
Social Studies of Science,
October 1, 2007;
37(5):
811 - 820.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
