|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
The Issues Deserve More CreditPragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy
Noortje Marres
Sociology Department, Goldsmiths College, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK, marres{at}dds.nl
This paper explores the `issue-oriented' perspective on public involvement in politics opened up by recent research in Science and Technology Studies (STS). This research proposes that public controversy around techno-scientific issues is dedicated to the articulation of these issues and their eventual accommodation in society. It does not, however, fully answer the question of why issue formation should be appreciated as a crucial dimension of democratic politics. To address this question, I turn to the work of two early 20th-century American pragmatists: John Dewey and Walter Lippmann. In their work on democracy in industrial society, they conceived of public involvement in politics as being occasioned by, and providing a way to settle, controversies that existing institutions were unable to resolve. Moreover, Dewey developed a `socio-ontological' understanding of issues, which suggests that people's involvement in politics is mediated by problems that affect them. Dewey and Lippmann thus provide important argumentative resources for further elaborating the approach to public involvement developed in STS. STS research has also developed a `socio-ontological' approach, as it focuses on the `attachments' that people mobilize (and that mobilize people) in the performance of their concern with public affairs. Such an approach provides an alternative to discursivist analysis of the role of `issue framing' in the involvement of publics in politics.
Key Words: issue formation • John Dewey • political democracy • public involvement in controversy • science and technology studies • Walter Lippmann
References
- Barry, Andrew (2001) Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society (London: The Athlone Press).
- Baumgartner, Frank R. & Bryan D. Jones (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
- Beck, Ulrich (1986) Risikogesellschaft: auf der Weg in einem andere Moderne [Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity] (Frankfurt am Maine: Surkampf).
- Beck, Ulrich (2002) Macht und Gegenmacht im globalen Zeitalter [Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy] (Frankfurt am Maine: Surkampf).
- Bennett, W. Lance (1998) `Ithiel Sola Pool Lecture: The UnCivic Culture: Communication, Identity, and the Rise of Lifestyle Politics', PS: Political Science and Politics 31(4): 740—61.[CrossRef]
- Bernstein, Richard J. (1985) `Dewey, Democracy: The Task Ahead', in J. Rajchman & C. West (eds), Post-analytic Philosophy (New York: Columbia University Press).
- Bijker, Wiebe (1995) Democratisering van de Technologische Cultuur, Inaugural address, University of Maastricht, Maastricht.
- Callon, Michel (ed.) (1998) The Laws of the Markets (Oxford & Keele: Blackwell and the Sociological Review).
- Callon, Michel (2004) `Europe Wrestling with Technology', Economy and Society 1(33): 121—34.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes& Yannick Barthe (2001) Agir dans un monde incertain. Essai sur la démocratie technique [Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy] (Paris: Seuil).
- De Vries, Gerard de (2007) `What is Political in Sub-politics?: How Aristotle Might Help STS', Social Studies of Science 37(5): 781—809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- De Wilde, Rein de (1997) `Ironies of the Eighth Day. Reflections on the Modern Faith in the Compatibility of Community, Democracy and Technology', paper presented at the Conference in Technology and Democracy, Centre for Technology and Culture (TMV), University of Oslo, January 17—19.
- Dewey, John (1991 [1927]) The Public and Its Problems ( Athens, OH: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press ).
- Dratwa, Jim (2003) Taking Risks with the Precautionary Principle, Doctoral Thesis, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation, Ecole des Mines, Paris.
- Dryzek, John (2000) Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
- Entman, Robert M. (1993) `Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm ', Journal of Communications 43(4): 51—59.[CrossRef]
- Festenstein, Matthew (1997) Pragmatism and Political Theory: From Dewey to Rorty (Chicago, IL, & Cambridge: University of Chicago Press/ Polity Press).
- Goffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (New York: Harper & Row Publishers).
- Gomart, Emilie & Maarten Hajer (2003) `Is That Politics? For an Inquiry into Forms in Contemporary Politics', in B. Joerges & H. Nowotny (eds), Looking Back, Ahead — The 2002 Yearbook for the Sociology of Sciences (Dordrecht: Kluwer).
- Gomart, Emilie & Antoine Hennion (1999) `A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users', in J. Law & J. Hassard (eds), Actor Network Theory and After (Oxford: Blackwell): 220—47.
- Habermas, Jü'rgen 2001 [1998] The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, trans. by Max Pensky (Cambridge & Oxford: Polity Press and Blackwell Publishers).
- Held, David (2004) Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus (Cambridge: Polity Press).
- Hinchliffe, Steve (2001) `Indeterminacy in-Decisions — Science, Policy, and Politics in the BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy) crisis', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 26(2): 182—204.[CrossRef]
- Irwin, Alan (2001) `Constructing the Scientific Citizen: Science and Democracy in the Biosciences', Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 1—18.[Abstract]
- Irwin, Alan & Mike Michael (2003) Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge (Maidenhead, Berks: Open University Press).
- Jasanoff, Sheila (2003) `Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science', Minerva 41(3): 223—44.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Jasanoff, Sheila (2005a) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
- Jasanoff, Sheila (2005b) `Let Them Eat Cake': GM Foods and the Democratic Imagination', in M. Leach, I. Scoones & B. Wynne (eds), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement (London: Zed Books ): 183—98.
- Keulartz, Jozef, Michiel Korthals, Maartje Schermer & Tsjalling Swierstra (2002) Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers).
- Latour, Bruno (1983) `Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World ', in K. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (eds), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science (London: Sage Publications): 141—70.
- Latour, Bruno (2001) `What Rules of Method for the New Socio-Scientific Experiments?' Darmsdadt Colloquium, plenary lecture (30 March), available at <www.bruno-latour.fr/poparticles/poparticle/p095.html> (accessed 1 January 2007).
- Latour, Bruno (2004 [1999]) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
- Leach, Melissa, Ian Scoones & Brian Wynne (eds) ( 2005) Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement (London: Zed Books ).
- Lippmann, Walter (1997 [1922]) Public Opinion (New York: Free Press Paperbacks, Simon & Schuster).
- Lippmann, Walter (2002 [1927]) The Phantom Public ( New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers).
- Lukes, Steven (1974) Power: A Radical View (London: MacMillan).
- Marres, Noortje (2005) No Issue, No Public: Democratic Deficits After the Displacement of Politics, Doctoral Dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
- Michael, Mike & Nik Brown (2005) `Scientific Citizenship: Self-representations of Xenotransplantation's Publics', Science as Culture 1(14): 39—57.
- Norris, Pippa (2002) Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
- Putnam, Hilary (2004) `Enlightment and Pragmatism', Part II of H. Putnam, Ethics Without Ontology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
- Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (1997) Towards a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press).
- Rogers, Richard & Noortje Marres (2000) `Landscaping Climate Change: A Mapping Technique for Understanding Science & Technology Debates on the World Wide Web', Public Understanding of Science 9(2): 141—63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Rorty, Richard (1982) Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972—1980 (Brighton, Sussex: Harvester Press).
- Ryan, Alan (1995) John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism (New York: W.W. Norton).
- Schattschneider, Eric Elmer (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America (Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers).
- Sclove, Richard (1995) Democracy and Technology (New York/London: Guilford Press ).
- Star, Susan Leigh & James Griesemer (1989) `Institutional Ecology, Translations and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907—39', Social Studies of Science 19(3): 387—420.[Abstract]
- Thompson, Paul (2002) ` Pragmatism, Discourse Ethics and Occasional Philosophy', In J. Keulartz, M. Korthals, M. Schermer & T. Swierstra (eds), Pragmatist Ethics for a Technological Culture (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers): 199—216.
- Vries, Gerard de (2002) `Doen we het zo goed? De plaats van het publieke debat over medische ethiek in een democratie [Is This How It Should Be Done? The Place of Public Debate on Medical Ethics in Democracy]', Krisis, Tijdschrift voor empirische filosofie 3(3): 39—59.
- Westbrook, Robert (2005) Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
- Wynne, Brian (1992) `Misunderstood Misunderstanding: Social Identities and Public Uptake of Science', Public Understanding of Science 1: 281—304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wynne, Brian (2005) `Risk as Globalizing `Democratic' Discourse? Framing Subjects and Citizens', in: M. Leach, I. Scoones & B. Wynne (eds), Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement (London: Zed Books ): 66—82.
Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 5,
759-780 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312706077367
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
The Spaces of Democracy and the Democracy of Space
What are the consequences of the 'spatial turn' for how we understand politics today? A proposed research agenda
Progress in Human Geography,
October 1, 2009;
33(5):
579 - 586.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Michael
Publics performing publics: of PiGs, PiPs and politics
Public Understanding of Science,
September 1, 2009;
18(5):
617 - 631.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. J. Boonstra and B. B. Bock
Fallacies of Virtualization: A Case Study of Farming, Manure, Landscapes, and Dutch Rural Policy
Science Technology Human Values,
July 1, 2009;
34(4):
427 - 448.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Latour
Turning Around Politics: A Note on Gerard de Vries' Paper
Social Studies of Science,
October 1, 2007;
37(5):
811 - 820.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
