Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zuiderent-Jerak, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Competition in the Wild

Reconfiguring Healthcare Markets

Teun Zuiderent-Jerak

Institute of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands, zuiderent{at}bmg.eur.nl

Michel Callon’s work on ‘the performativity of economics’ raises interesting theoretical challenges for the social study of markets. Callon proposes that laws of markets do exist, but mainly because they are performed, shaped and formatted through the way economics develops ‘spaces of calculation’. The performativity thesis proposes that if markets are not natural entities, but are instead performed by economics, this may open up the reconfiguration of market practices to many previously excluded actors, including STS scholars. However, Callon’s focus on the role of materialities in performing spaces of calculation and the role of economics in creating these materialities, easily leads to over-enthusiasm for the potential of STS scholars to engage in reconfiguring markets. Based on an interventionist research project on performing healthcare markets as ‘value’-driven, rather than ‘cost-saving’driven, I argue that markets can ‘work’ despite the absence of well-functioning materialities. This problematizes the approach pursued by Callon, and I therefore propose to temper the ambitions of STS scholars involved in the reconfiguration of markets to direct them towards the analysis of historically grown prevailing market regimes and market practices as ‘forms of the probable’ for such reconfiguration. Analysing such probabilities may be fruitful for reflecting on the risks that such experimental interventions entail for reconfiguring markets.

Key Words: healthcare markets • interventionist STS • Michel Callon • performativity of economics • reconfiguration

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 39, No. 5, 765-792 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312709104433


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
A. Cambrosio, P. Keating, T. Schlich, and G. Weisz
Biomedical Conventions and Regulatory Objectivity: A Few Introductory Remarks
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2009; 39(5): 651 - 664.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
L. Thevenot
Postscript to the Special Issue: Governing Life by Standards: A View from Engagements
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2009; 39(5): 793 - 813.
[Abstract] [PDF]