This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Goedeke, T.L. Articles by Rikoon, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Otters as Actors

Scientific Controversy, Dynamism of Networks, and the Implications of Power in Ecological Restoration

NOAA/NOS/NCCOS, Building SSMC4, Rm B117, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA, theresa.goedeke{at}noaa.go

S. Rikoon

Department of Rural Sociology, Gentry Hall 120, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211-7040, USA, RikoonJ{at}missouri.edu

In this paper, we use scientific controversy emerging from a river otter restoration project in Missouri to explore the role of nonhuman actors in the dynamism of networks forming to establish the ideals and outcomes of ecological restoration. We demonstrate how an epistemic controversy, sparked by the failure of authoritative spokespersons (such as scientists) to enroll river otters, fish, and waterways, opened the door for a more diverse group of spokespersons who, in turn, enrolled more actors to settle the controversy. Thus, we emphasize the need to recognize the role of nonhumans as catalysts and actors because of their potential to challenge and change networks. Second, we explore the struggle between the networks that emerged to (re)define the restoration narrative as accomplished (necessitating the trapping of otters) or incomplete (with the otter population in possible jeopardy). Finally, our discussion highlights the importance of convergence and power when competing networks are involved. The otter restoration case study makes evident that a successful exercise of power has significant consequences for human and nonhuman actors alike, all of which have a stake in the landscape.

Key Words: animal rights • conflict • landscape • nonhuman • scientific uncertainty wildlife management

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 38, No. 1, 111-132 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312707077363


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?