| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0306312707078013 Obvious DecisionsDecision-making among French Ponts-et-Chaussées Engineers around 180024 rue Montmartre 75001 Paris, frederic.graber{at}neuf.fr This paper investigates the decision-making procedures in a technical assembly, the assemblée des Ponts et Chaussées, at the turn of the 19th century. The assemblée was the central institution of a French public-works administration, in which projects were discussed and adopted. The paper describes the transformations of this institution, its routine functioning, and focuses especially on a very controversial case during the Consulate, the Saint-Quentin canal, where conflicting opinions about the use of the vote emerged. The paper studies the engineers' preference for a consensus procedure and their mistrust for the vote. It analyses the epistemological justifications of such a consensus, especially the references to different forms of `obviousness', and its practical social forms, especially the importance (and ambiguous meaning) of silence.
Key Words: consensus French state engineers public works technical assembly voting
|