Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marres, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Issues Deserve More Credit

Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy

Noortje Marres

Sociology Department, Goldsmiths College, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK, marres{at}dds.nl

This paper explores the `issue-oriented' perspective on public involvement in politics opened up by recent research in Science and Technology Studies (STS). This research proposes that public controversy around techno-scientific issues is dedicated to the articulation of these issues and their eventual accommodation in society. It does not, however, fully answer the question of why issue formation should be appreciated as a crucial dimension of democratic politics. To address this question, I turn to the work of two early 20th-century American pragmatists: John Dewey and Walter Lippmann. In their work on democracy in industrial society, they conceived of public involvement in politics as being occasioned by, and providing a way to settle, controversies that existing institutions were unable to resolve. Moreover, Dewey developed a `socio-ontological' understanding of issues, which suggests that people's involvement in politics is mediated by problems that affect them. Dewey and Lippmann thus provide important argumentative resources for further elaborating the approach to public involvement developed in STS. STS research has also developed a `socio-ontological' approach, as it focuses on the `attachments' that people mobilize (and that mobilize people) in the performance of their concern with public affairs. Such an approach provides an alternative to discursivist analysis of the role of `issue framing' in the involvement of publics in politics.

Key Words: issue formation • John Dewey • political democracy • public involvement in controversy • science and technology studies • Walter Lippmann

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 5, 759-780 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312706077367
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Prog Hum GeogrHome page
The Spaces of Democracy and the Democracy of Space
What are the consequences of the 'spatial turn' for how we understand politics today? A proposed research agenda
Progress in Human Geography, October 1, 2009; 33(5): 579 - 586.
[PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. Michael
Publics performing publics: of PiGs, PiPs and politics
Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 617 - 631.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
W. J. Boonstra and B. B. Bock
Fallacies of Virtualization: A Case Study of Farming, Manure, Landscapes, and Dutch Rural Policy
Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2009; 34(4): 427 - 448.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Studies of ScienceHome page
B. Latour
Turning Around Politics: A Note on Gerard de Vries' Paper
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2007; 37(5): 811 - 820.
[PDF]