This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kerr, A. Articles by Tutton, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Shifting Subject Positions

Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue

School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK

Sarah Cunningham-Burley

University of Edinburgh, Medical Buildings, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK, Sarah.C.Burley{at}ed.ac.uk

Richard Tutton

University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK, richard.tutton{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Public dialogue about science, technology and medicine is an established part of the activities of a range of charities, private corporations, governmental departments and scientific institutions. However, the extent to which these activities challenge or bridge the lay—expert divide is questionable. Expertise is contested, by the public and the community of scholars who study and/or facilitate public engagement. In this paper, we explore the dynamics of expertise and their implications for the lay—expert divide at a series of public events about the new genetics. We examine participants' claims to expertise and consider how this relates to their claims to credibility and legitimacy and the way in which these events unfolded. Using a combination of ethnographic and discursive analysis, we found that participants supplemented technical expertise with other expert and lay perspectives. We can also link participants' claims to expertise to their generally positive appraisal of genetic research and services. The colonization of lay positions by expert speakers and the hybrid positioning of lay—experts was characteristic of the consensus and conservatism that emerged. This leads us to conclude that public engagement activities will not challenge the dominance of technical expertise in decision-making about science, technology and medicine without more explicit and reflexive problematization of the dynamics of expertise therein.

Key Words: Citizenship • expertise • genetics • public consultation

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 3, 385-411 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312706068492


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Michael Publics performing publics: of PiGs, PiPs and politics Public Understanding of Science, September 1, 2009; 18(5): 617 - 631. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. R. Davies Constructing Communication: Talking to Scientists About Talking to the Public Science Communication, June 1, 2008; 29(4): 413 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF]