This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by van Hilvoorde, I. Articles by de Wert, G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Flopping, Klapping and Gene Doping

Dichotomies Between ‘Natural’ and ‘Artificial’ in Elite Sport

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, The Netherlands, I.vanHilvoorde{at}fbw.vu.nl

Rein Vos

Maastricht University, rein.vos{at}zw.unimaas

Guido de Wert

Maastricht University, g.dewert{at}zw.unimaas.nl

The application of genetic technology seems to threaten what is considered natural in elite sport. This paper explores the role of genetic technology in elite sport and questions the significance of dichotomizing between the natural and artificial element. How do shifts in technology affect the attribution of the human element in athletic performance? To explore the attribution of human agency we compare the genetic enhancement of athletes with two other shifts of the ‘natural performance’ in sport: first, the introduction of a revolutionary high jump technique, the Fosbury flop, in 1968; and, second, the introduction of the klapskate in speed skating in 1997. The three cases show that artificiality as such can hardly be a criterion for evaluating processes of innovation. The context of elite sport is itself highly artificial. Boundaries between the natural body and the enhanced body are the outcome of institutional processes of boundary work. When discussing new technologies in sport it is better to ask if athletes are still playing the same game and whether or not there are equal opportunities and an equal distribution of means for playing the game. The introduction of gene technology may result in inequalities, with great impact on the outcome of the game. This outcome may be considered irrelevant for the inequalities that the game is supposed to produce and measure. Genetic enhancement may also threaten the public view of athletes as moral agents and possibly change the appreciation for human performance.

Key Words: elite sport • Fosbury flop • gene doping • (gene) technology • klapskate • natural versus artificial • relevant inequalities • sport ethics

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37, No. 2, 173-200 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312706063784


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Hutchins Signs of meta-change in second modernity: the growth of e-sport and the World Cyber Games New Media Society, December 1, 2008; 10(6): 851 - 869. [Abstract] [PDF]