Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shepherd, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

From In Vitro to In Situ

On the Precarious Extension of Agricultural Science in the Indigenous ‘Third World’

Chris J. Shepherd

Globalism Institute, RMIT University, Melbourne, chris.shepherd{at}rmit.edu.au

Southern non-governmental organizations (NGOs) now act as important intermediaries in the transfer of agricultural science and technology for the development of Third World food production and markets. This paper presents an ethnographic exploration at the interface of Peruvian agricultural development NGOs and highland peasant communities, who are encouraged to leave subsistence farming and produce instead for wider markets. Following a methodology of symmetrical anthropology based in actor-network theory, I show how sociotechnical processes that underpin agricultural development rely on constructions of ‘traditional’ and ‘modern’ categories of practice in order to perpetuate efforts to change the peasant production methods. Yet as peasants appropriate and reinvent development’s technologies and resources, NGOs are pressured to further control the ‘discrepant’ responses and behaviours of peasants. Focusing on a number of NGOs and indigenous, Quechua-speaking communities in the southern Andes, I argue that the incorporation of peasants into markets is made problematic by both entrenched racial tensions and the creative capacity of peasants to circumvent the disciplining and social planning strategies of NGOs.

Key Words: actor-network theory • agricultural development • non-governmental organization • Peru

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 36, No. 3, 399-426 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312706055272


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Critique of AnthropologyHome page
L. Phillips and S. Ilcan
Responsible Expertise: Governing the Uncertain Subjects of Biotechnology
Critique of Anthropology, March 1, 2007; 27(1): 103 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
C. J. Shepherd and M. R. Gibbs
"Stretching the Friendship": On the Politics of Replicating a Dairy in East Timor
Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2006; 31(6): 668 - 701.
[Abstract] [PDF]