| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Heterogeneity and Coordination of Blood Pressure in NeurosurgeryCentre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, t.e.moreira{at}ncl.ac.uk Blood pressure is one of the key measurements taken in standard clinical examinations. Its importance has long been associated with the instrumental precision offered by the sphygmomanometer, which is supposed to have replaced other, more imprecise methods of blood pressure measurement, such as feeling the pulse with the finger. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork in a neurosurgical clinic, this paper explores the co-existence of the sphygmomanometer and the finger methods in practice. I argue that in neurosurgery these methods are both independent from and interdependent with each other: independent in the way they achieve different assessments of the patients blood pressure at the same time; and interdependent in the way the surgeons and anaesthetists measurements are dynamically linked with each other. The paper suggests that this particular form of coordination through heterogeneity might be described, borrowing from Michel Serres work, as mutual parasitism, and that this metaphor might be useful in rethinking the role of science - research, or evidence - in medical practice.
Key Words: anaesthetics ethnography knowledge practices Le Parasite neurosurgery
Social Studies of Science, Vol. 36, No. 1,
69-97 (2006) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||
