Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prentice, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Anatomy of a Surgical Simulation

The Mutual Articulation of Bodies in and through the Machine

Rachel Prentice

Science and Technology Studies Department, 305 Rockefeller Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USArep35{at}cornell.edu

Engineers, computer programmers, and surgeons have begun to develop virtual reality simulators designed to teach the physical aspects of surgical skills, especially the skills needed to perform minimally invasive procedures. The technologies incorporated in these simulations, including graphic modeling, haptic (tactile and kinesthetic) interface design, and haptic cognitive studies, reconstruct surgical knowledge that traditionally remains tacit, such as knowledge of surgeons’ movements and forces used on tissues. A surgeon’s physical experience becomes mathematized when programmers reconstruct it for computers. This paper describes how researchers construct ‘body objects’, representations of bodies and body parts that are engineered to inhabit computer programs. This paper argues that surgical learning occurs at the interface of bodies and instruments, through simultaneous sculpting of the surgical site and training of the surgeon’s body, a process I call mutual articulation.

Key Words: articulation • body • graphic modeling • haptics • perception • simulation • surgery • virtual reality

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 35, No. 6, 837-866 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312705053351
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Body SocietyHome page
E. Johnson
Simulating Medical Patients and Practices: Bodies and the Construction of Valid Medical Simulators
Body Society, September 1, 2008; 14(3): 105 - 128.
[PDF]

Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
E. S. Johnson
Out of My Viewfinder, Yet in the Picture: Seeing the Hospital in Medical Simulations
Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 53 - 76.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
R. Prentice
Drilling Surgeons: The Social Lessons of Embodied Surgical Learning
Science Technology Human Values, September 1, 2007; 32(5): 534 - 553.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Studies of ScienceHome page
E. Johnson
Surgical simulators and simulated surgeons: reconstituting medical practice and practitioners in simulations.
Social Studies of Science, August 1, 2007; 37(4): 585 - 608.
[Abstract] [PDF]