Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Can’t Any Body Count?

Counting as an Epistemic Theme in the History of Human Chromosomes

Aryn Martin

Cornell University’s Department of Science and Technology Studies, am285{at}cornell.edu

This paper examines the well-known ‘error’ in the history of human chromosome counting. In the early 1920s, T.S. Painter, supported by a number of independent investigators, placed the count at 48, which was to hold as a fact for more than 30 years. In 1956, Tjio and Levan surprisingly revised the count to 46. The details of the case are used to open up the very practice of counting to theoretical scrutiny. Counting, often taken-for-granted as mundane and transparent, is instead a richly contingent activity entailing categorical judgments and individuation of objects. Inverting the assumption that entities are there in the world waiting to be counted, I propose that particular objects are constituted as such while they are counted. As the chromosome story demonstrates, the techniques, theories, disciplines, and the things themselves co-evolve through practices of counting. Between the 1920s and the 1950s every one of these factors was in flux in the field of human genetics; it should be no surprise that the number of chromosomes changed.

Key Words: chromosomes • counting • cytology • ethnomethodology • human cytogenetics • numerical constants

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 34, No. 6, 923-948 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312704046843


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Mixed Methods ResearchHome page
M. Sandelowski, C. I. Voils, and G. Knafl
On Quantitizing
Journal of Mixed Methods Research, July 1, 2009; 3(3): 208 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
J. Lorimer
Counting Corncrakes: The Affective Science of the UK Corncrake Census
Social Studies of Science, June 1, 2008; 38(3): 377 - 405.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Discourse StudiesHome page
M. Lynch
Cognitive activities without cognition? ethnomethodological investigations of selected 'cognitive' topics
Discourse Studies, February 1, 2006; 8(1): 95 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]