Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bijsterveld, K.
Right arrow Articles by Schulp, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Breaking into a World of Perfection

Innovation in Today’s Classical Musical Instruments

Karin Bijsterveld

Technology and Society Studies Department, Maastricht University, the Netherlands, k.bijsterveld{at}tss.unimaas.nl

Marten Schulp

martenschulp{at}mac.com

Professional music journals frequently publish descriptions of newly registered patents concerning classical musical instruments. Only a few of the many proposals for innovation actually enter production. The large number of ideas for improving musical instruments such as the violin, the flute and the bassoon contrasts strikingly with the stability of the often age-old design of these instruments. Notably, the instruments of the symphony orchestra have basically retained their features since the mid-19th century. Compared with many other artefacts of Western culture, such stability in design and outlook is remarkable. Why is this? And what strategies do today’s innovation-seeking instrument makers use to break into this world of perfection? How, in other words, do they innovate and sell in a tradition-bound field? Moreover, how could insights in such strategies be valid for fields of technology-development in which tradition and craft have a similar significance? To address these questions, we examined music journals and, based on interviews and promotional literature, we explored the views and opinions of 12 instrument makers and promoters of unusually constructed flutes, bassoons, saxophones, violas, guitars and oboe-reeds. To account for their work, we will focus on the role of attachment to technology, on the go-betweens whose creative marginality enables them to connect technological and musical cultures and on the relevance of recasting tradition so as to innovate and sustain tradition at the very same time.

Key Words: attachment to technology • classical musical instrument making • creative marginality • innovation in tradition-bound fields • recasting tradition

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 34, No. 5, 649-674 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312704047171


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
T. Pinch and K. Bijsterveld
Sound Studies: New Technologies and Music
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2004; 34(5): 635 - 648.
[PDF]