Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Voskuhl, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Humans, Machines, and Conversations

An Ethnographic Study of the Making of Automatic Speech Recognition Technologies

Adelheid Voskuhl

Department of Science and Technology Studies at Cornell University, acv3{at}cornell.edu

This essay investigates the design of automatic speech recognition (ASR) technologies as a site at which the human qualities of ‘hearing’ and ‘understanding’ are mimicked in machines. On the basis of an observational study, it explains the major work components and debates in ASR, such as research paradigms and strategies, as well as the intricacies of instruments and experimentation. Key arguments concern the tensions, conflicts, and ambiguities that emerge from the intersection of disparate research paradigms in ASR. The study emphasizes the actors’ success in establishing a local context of stable, practical rationality in which they negotiate the complementary and conflicting research objectives of building speech recognition machines, on one hand, and understanding human hearing, on the other. The conclusion is cast in terms of a ‘functional contingency’, a concept that characterizes this setting in which researchers successfully make machines ‘recognize speech’ and in so doing make the machines part of specific types of ‘conversation’.

Key Words: artificial intelligence • automatic speech recognition • controversy • ethnography • human-machine interaction

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 34, No. 3, 393-421 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312704043576
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
A. Beaulieu, A. Scharnhorst, and P. Wouters
Not Another Case Study: A Middle-Range Interrogation of Ethnographic Case Studies in the Exploration of E-science
Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2007; 32(6): 672 - 692.
[Abstract] [PDF]