Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cambrosio, A.
Right arrow Articles by Mogoutov, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Mapping Collaborative Work and Innovation in Biomedicine

A Computer-Assisted Analysis of Antibody Reagent Workshops

Alberto Cambrosio

Department of Social Studies of Medicine of McGill University (Montreal, Canada), alberto.cambrosio{at}mcgill.ca

Peter Keating

University of Quebec at Montreal, keating.peter{at}uqam.ca

Andrei Mogoutov

AGUIDEL, mogoutov{at}aguidel.com

This paper analyses a major episode in contemporary biomedical research using a new semi-quantitative approach. In the late 1970s, immunologists began producing new kinds of antibodies targeting molecules on the surface of normal and malignant blood cells. These tools quickly transformed biomedical research in immunology and oncology-hematology. Laboratories worldwide produced thousands of these new reagents and reorganized the classification, diagnosis, and prognosis of diseases such as leukemia and the lymphomas. The rapid development of these reagents initially generated considerable confusion. To avoid the impending chaos, researchers in the field, officially supported by the World Health Organization and the International Union of Immunological Societies, launched an ongoing series of distributed workshops that led to the establishment of a nomenclature of antibody reagents and cell surface molecules. The First Workshop (1981-82) mobilized 54 research groups from 14 countries and resulted in the establishment of 15 antibody/molecule categories. By the late 1990s the number of these categories had increased to more than 247 and the number of participating laboratories had risen to more than 500. Sociological analyses of this kind of large-scale collaborative research usually adopt one of two equally unsatisfactory alternatives: either they provide thick descriptions of selected sites, thus missing the figurational dimension of the collaborative network, or they attempt to account for figurational complexity by reducing it to a few quantitative indicators, thus destroying for all practical purposes the very phenomena under investigation. To avoid these two alternatives, we opted for a combination of ethnographic methods (interviews, content analysis) and a computer-based analysis of the more than 6000 antibodies examined during the first six workshops, using Réseau-Lu, a software program specifically designed for the treatment of heterogeneous relational data.

Key Words: antibody reagents • biomedical networks • cluster designation nomenclature • cluster designation workshops • network analysis • Réseau-Lu

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 34, No. 3, 325-364 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312704043767


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
S. Mutzel
Networks as Culturally Constituted Processes: A Comparison of Relational Sociology and Actor-network Theory
Current Sociology, November 1, 2009; 57(6): 871 - 887.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
V. Rabeharisoa and P. Bourret
Staging and Weighting Evidence in Biomedicine: Comparing Clinical Practices in Cancer Genetics and Psychiatric Genetics
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2009; 39(5): 691 - 715.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
A. Yaneva, T. M. Rabesandratana, and B. Greiner
Staging scientific controversies: a gallery test on science museums' interactivity
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2009; 18(1): 79 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
L. Prior
Repositioning Documents in Social Research
Sociology, October 1, 2008; 42(5): 821 - 836.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
M. Sundberg
Mobilizing Networks: Researcher Roles in Atmospheric Science
Acta Sociologica, September 1, 2007; 50(3): 271 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
P. Bourret, A. Mogoutov, C. Julian-Reynier, and A. Cambrosio
A New Clinical Collective for French Cancer Genetics: A Heterogeneous Mapping Analysis
Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2006; 31(4): 431 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]