This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Doing, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

‘Lab Hands’ and the ‘Scarlet O’

Epistemic Politics and (Scientific) Labor

Cornell University, pad9{at}cornell.edu

This paper is a history of the promotion and use of models of technical knowledge production over a seven-year period at a modern physics laboratory. In this analysis, models are seen as reflexively performed in the course of laboratory practice and intertwined with issues of authority and control in the laboratory. Attempts to associate or disassociate different models of knowledge production with different identities at play in the laboratory, in particular those of ‘scientist’ and ‘operator’, are traced. The concepts of ‘epistemic politics’ and ‘identity work’ are explicated. To account for the relationship between technical knowledge claims, laboratory identities, modes of accountability, and the control of labor both inside and outside of the laboratory. Changes in this relationship over time at the laboratory are considered. In combining sensibilities from labor relations with insights from science and technology studies (STS) writings on expertise, the paper provides an example of a new kind of laboratory study in which accepted modes of authority and control are seen as implicated in the day to day production of technical knowledge in the laboratory, and performances of ‘legitimate’ means of technical knowledge production, and ‘legitimate’ technical identities, are likewise implicated in the ongoing negotiation of laboratory organization and order. Through this kind of analysis, issues of gender, race, and labor are engaged with the detailed world of technical knowledge production. The status of the account itself as a performance and intervention is highlighted through the intertwined narratives of experience on the part of the author of both the laboratory and of different strands of STS literature.

Key Words: epistemology • expertise • gender • identity • laboratory • practice

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 34, No. 3, 299-323 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312704043677


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Wei Hong Domination in a Scientific Field: Capital Struggle in a Chinese Isotope Lab Social Studies of Science, August 1, 2008; 38(4): 543 - 570. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. C. Powell Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures Progress in Human Geography, June 1, 2007; 31(3): 309 - 329. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Vogel Bioweapons Proliferation: Where Science Studies and Public Policy Collide Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2006; 36(5): 659 - 690. [Abstract] [PDF]