Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kinchy, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kleinman, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Organizing Credibility

Discursive and Organizational Orthodoxy on the Borders of Ecology and Politics

Abby J. Kinchy

Departments of Sociology and Rural Sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, akinchy{at}ssc.wisc.edu

Daniel Lee Kleinman

Department of Rural Sociology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Science and Technology Studies Program, dlkleinman{at}facstaff.wisc.edu

In the present paper, we show that in its efforts to maintain credibility and claim social relevance, the Ecological Society of America (ESA) and its members repeatedly negotiate a boundary between science and politics. While the boundaries of ecology are flexibly defined, contingent on political context and what is at stake, they are also shaped and constrained by the already constructed social world. Several factors shape the ESA’s boundary-work: (1) historically resonant discourses of both value-freedom and the utility of science; (2) national politics, including social movements and the demands of funding bodies; (3) the structure and actions of other, often more prestigious, scientific societies; and (4) established orthodoxies of scientific behavior. We contribute to the scholarly literature on credibility in science by showing that the construction of boundaries between science and politics is, in some cases, better understood as the reproduction of the already constructed social world than as a product of strategic efforts in pursuit of individual interests.

Key Words: boundary work • credibility • Ecological Society of America • environmentalism • scientific societies

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 33, No. 6, 869-896 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312703336003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
J. Tuunainen and T. Knuuttila
Intermingling Academic and Business Activities: A New Direction for Science and Universities?
Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2009; 34(6): 684 - 704.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Public Understanding of ScienceHome page
M. S. Evans
Defining the public, defining sociology: hybrid science--public relations and boundary-work in early American sociology
Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2009; 18(1): 5 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Studies of ScienceHome page
E. Popp Berman
Why did universities start patenting? Institution-building and the road to the Bayh-Dole Act.
Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2008; 38(6): 835 - 871.
[Abstract] [PDF]