Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacFarlane, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Underlying Yucca Mountain

The Interplay of Geology and Policy in Nuclear Waste Disposal

Allison MacFarlane

Georgia Institute of Technology, allison.macfarlane{at}inta.gatech.edu

Nuclear waste disposal in the USA is a difficult policy issue infused with science, technology, and politics. This issue provides an example of the co-production of scientific knowledge and politics through public policy. The proponents of a repository site at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, argue that their decision to go ahead with the site is based on ‘sound science’, but the science they use to uphold their decision is influenced by politics. In turn, the politics of site selection has been altered by the scientific knowledge produced. Interestingly, changes in the scientific understanding of the site have forced policy-makers to look elsewhere for solutions. In the case of Yucca Mountain, they turned to engineering solutions that have, ironically, rendered any benefits of the site location superfluous. The Yucca Mountain example has significant implications for the ability of policy-makers to carry out an apparently democratic process for a science policy issue.

Key Words: co-production • nuclear waste policy • regulatory science • technology policy

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 33, No. 5, 783-807 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312703335006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Social Studies of ScienceHome page
R. E. Doel
Constituting the Postwar Earth Sciences: The Military's Influence on the Environmental Sciences in the USA after 1945
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2003; 33(5): 635 - 666.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Studies of ScienceHome page
M. A. Dennis
Earthly Matters: On the Cold War and the Earth Sciences
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2003; 33(5): 809 - 819.
[PDF]