This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Barth, K.-H. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Politics of Seismology

Nuclear Testing, Arms Control, and the Transformation of a Discipline

Security Studies Program at Georgetown University’s School of Foreign Service, khb3{at}georgetown.edu

The present paper analyzes the transformation of seismology from a small academic discipline to a large academic-military-industrial enterprise during the 1960s. In the late 1950s scientists, diplomats, and policy-makers recognized that improved seismological knowledge was crucial for the detection and identification of Soviet underground nuclear-weapon tests. Consequently, the Eisenhower administration initiated a comprehensive research and development program in seismology, known as Project Vela Uniform. Vela Uniform, managed by the Department of Defense’s Advanced Research Projects Agency, increased annual federal support for US seismology by more than a factor of 30. An analysis of the origins, mechanisms, and consequences of Department of Defense patronage for seismology is at the center of this paper. I emphasize the role of scientific advisory groups and mission agency program managers in negotiating the field’s research directions. I argue that despite massive Department of Defense patronage, academic seismologists did not lose control over their field. They participated actively in the transformation of their discipline, realizing that arms control requirements offered a unique opportunity to modernize their field. This suggests that the case of seismology challenges some of the assumptions of the ‘distortionist’ theory, the dominant historiographical approach to science in the Cold War.

Key Words: Cold War • knowledge production • military patronage • Project Vela Uniform • scientific discipline • seismology

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 33, No. 5, 743-781 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312703335005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Dean, S. Naylor, S. Turchetti, and M. Siegert Data in Antarctic Science and Politics Social Studies of Science, August 1, 2008; 38(4): 571 - 604. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. E. Hough Seismology and the International Geophysical Year Seismological Research Letters, March 1, 2008; 79(2): 224 - 231. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. E. Doel Constituting the Postwar Earth Sciences: The Military's Influence on the Environmental Sciences in the USA after 1945 Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2003; 33(5): 635 - 666. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Dennis Earthly Matters: On the Cold War and the Earth Sciences Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2003; 33(5): 809 - 819. [PDF]