Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harper, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research from the Boundary Layer

Civilian Leadership, Military Funding and the Development of Numerical Weather Prediction (1946-55)

Kristine C. Harper

kharper{at}proaxis.com

In the USA, civilian meteorological organizations traditionally controlled weather services during peacetime, and the military controlled them during wartime. However, after World War II, the military retained control of meteorological research funding. Academics pursued theoretical issues, and the US Weather Bureau concentrated on improving forecasts. Post-war advances in electronic computing encouraged these groups to pool funding, theoretical knowledge, and forecasting skills, to develop numerical weather prediction techniques that would radically change 20th-century meteorology. The Institute for Advanced Study’s Meteorology Project illustrates how research is negotiated across intra-disciplinary boundaries, in relation to Cold War era themes of international scientific exchange, the integration of practice with theory, the role of research schools, and the tension between military and civilian control of science. The present paper also raises a significant epistemological issue characteristic of 20th-century science: who possesses the better scientific understanding - those who crunch numbers, or those for whom observational data hold meaning?

Key Words: Cold War • computing • internationalism • meteorology • research schools

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 33, No. 5, 667-696 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312703335003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
M. Sundberg
The Everyday World of Simulation Modeling: The Development of Parameterizations in Meteorology
Science Technology Human Values, March 1, 2009; 34(2): 162 - 181.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
R. E. Doel
Constituting the Postwar Earth Sciences: The Military's Influence on the Environmental Sciences in the USA after 1945
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2003; 33(5): 635 - 666.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
M. A. Dennis
Earthly Matters: On the Cold War and the Earth Sciences
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2003; 33(5): 809 - 819.
[PDF]