Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mackenzie, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

These Things Called Systems

Collective Imaginings and Infrastructural Software

Adrian Mackenzie

Lancaster University, UK. a.mackenzie{at}lancaster.ac.uk

The present paper proposes a way of reading telecommunications systems, software protocols and specifications in terms of collective imaginings of mobility. It reports on an ethnographic study of a large software system designed to control telecommunications infrastructure in rural Australia. Drawing on a notion of infrastructural work as involving an imagining of mobility, the paper develops two lines of inquiry. First, it asks how practices of imagining help us to understand the embodied practices and bewildering variety of artefacts circling around the development of a large distributed software system. These practices include the heavy use of citation, the interweaving of different tropes, metaphors and figures through the system, and the role of figures such as `system' and `process' in organizing work. Second, the present paper suggests that intensely invested issues in software production such as configurability, scalability, flexibility and distributing process imply that infrastructural design and implementation have a complicated relation to place. Via recent theoretical critiques of ethnography, it asks how notions such as locality and place can encompass mutually contextualizing movements and imaginings of movement.

Key Words: ethnography • imagination • infrastructure • locality • software

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 33, No. 3, 365-387 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/03063127030333003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EthnographyHome page
A. Higgins
`Code talk' in soft work
Ethnography, December 1, 2007; 8(4): 467 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
A. Beaulieu, A. Scharnhorst, and P. Wouters
Not Another Case Study: A Middle-Range Interrogation of Ethnographic Case Studies in the Exploration of E-science
Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2007; 32(6): 672 - 692.
[Abstract] [PDF]