|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Science Consultants, Fictional Films, and Scientific Practice
David A. Kirby
Department of Science and Technology Studies, dk246{at}cornell.edu
When scientists act as consultants during the production of a fictional film, it becomes an act of communication that plays a role in the process of science. Fictional film provides a space for scientists to visually model their conceptions of nature. Film impacts scientific practice as science consultants utilize film as a virtual witnessing technology to gather allies among specialists and non-specialists. Film not only has the ability to act as a virtual witnessing technology, but also forces consensus on the public version of scientific debates by presenting a single vision of nature in a perceptually realistic structure. This paper shows films to be successful communicative devices within the scientific community by showing that, and how, other scientists respond to the depictions in the films. It also demonstrates that science consultants use fictional films as promotional devices for their research fields.
Key Words: fictional media perceptual realism representation science communication science consultants scientific controversy virtual witnessing
Social Studies of Science, Vol. 33, No. 2,
231-268 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/03063127030332015

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Haran and J. Kitzinger
Modest witnessing and managing the boundaries between science and the media: A case study of breakthrough and scandal
Public Understanding of Science,
November 1, 2009;
18(6):
634 - 652.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Heath and D. vom Lehn
Configuring 'Interactivity': Enhancing Engagement in Science Centres and Museums
Social Studies of Science,
February 1, 2008;
38(1):
63 - 91.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Mellor
Colliding Worlds: Asteroid Research and the Legitimization of War in Space
Social Studies of Science,
August 1, 2007;
37(4):
499 - 531.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Slayton
Discursive Choices: Boycotting Star Wars Between Science and Politics
Social Studies of Science,
February 1, 2007;
37(1):
27 - 66.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Dingwall and M. Aldridge
Television wildlife programming as a source of popular scientific information: a case study of evolution
Public Understanding of Science,
April 1, 2006;
15(2):
131 - 152.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Evans
Bibliography
Public Understanding of Science,
October 1, 2003;
12(4):
445 - 446.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Mellor
Between Fact and Fiction: Demarcating Science from Non-Science in Popular Physics Books
Social Studies of Science,
August 1, 2003;
33(4):
509 - 538.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|