This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Waterton, C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

From Field to Fantasy

Classifying Nature, Constructing Europe

Institute for Environment, Philosophy & Public Policy, Lancaster University, Furness College, Lancaster LA1 4YG, UK; fax: +44 1524 846339 or 592503; c.waterton{at}lancaster.ac.uk

This paper sets out some observations on the making, and use, of contemporary classifications of nature in the context of a simultaneous and on-going `making' of Europe. It looks in particular at two classifications, one of British vegetation communities and the other of European `biotopes' (a concept that closely relates to natural or semi-natural `habitats') - respectively, the UK National Vegetation Classification (NVC) and the EU CORINE Biotopes Classification. It investigates aspects of the relationship between these two classifications which has come about through their use in a European conservation policy. The CORINE Biotopes classification, in particular, represents a new ordering of nature in a very active sense: it is a good example of a `working archive', and is intimately tied into policy decisions at many levels in Europe. The paper addresses questions as to how contemporary classifications are being made and used, and whether certain tacit understandings and conceptual frameworks `built in' to them reflect back upon the world at a later stage. It argues that these classifications do not always simply reflect the assumptions and understandings built into them: once in the policy domain, they are not as `reversible' as that. Their categories quickly become unstable, mutating and interacting in sometimes unpredictable ways. The two classifications, through their relationship with policy, have a jointly evolving history. The continual renewal of meaning attached to classes within these classifications appears to reflect outwards rather than inwards - in chorus with the broader social and political context, rather than reflecting the condition of their making. In their evolving forms, they illustrate very well the complex nature of the dynamic between unity and diversity, centre and periphery, that lies at the heart of the European Union.

Key Words: classification • CORINE Biotopes • ethnography • habitats • NVC • policy

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 32, No. 2, 177-204 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0306312702032002001


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Lorimer Counting Corncrakes: The Affective Science of the UK Corncrake Census Social Studies of Science, June 1, 2008; 38(3): 377 - 405. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Beaulieu, A. Scharnhorst, and P. Wouters Not Another Case Study: A Middle-Range Interrogation of Ethnographic Case Studies in the Exploration of E-science Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2007; 32(6): 672 - 692. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. F. Gieryn City as Truth-Spot: Laboratories and Field-Sites in Urban Studies Social Studies of Science, February 1, 2006; 36(1): 5 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W.-M. Roth Making Classifications (at) Work: Ordering Practices in Science Social Studies of Science, August 1, 2005; 35(4): 581 - 621. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Castree Environmental issues: signals in the noise? Progress in Human Geography, February 1, 2004; 28(1): 79 - 90. [PDF]