Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire

H. M. Collins

Centre for the Study of Knowledge, Expertise and Science (KES), Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, The Glamorgan Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff CF10 3WT, UK; fax: +44 2920 874175;CollinsHM{at}Cardiff.ac.uk

Russian measurements of the quality factor (Q) of sapphire, made 20 years ago, have only just been repeated in the West. Shortfalls in tacit knowledge have been partly responsible for this delay. The idea of `tacit knowledge', first put forward by the physical chemist Michael Polanyi, has been studied and analysed over the last two decades. A new classification of tacit knowledge (broadly construed) is offered here and applied to the case of sapphire. The importance of personal contact between scientists is brought out and the sources of trust described. It is suggested that the reproduction of scientific findings could be aided by a small addition to the information contained in experimental reports. The analysis is done in the context of fieldwork conducted in the USA and observations of experimental work at Glasgow University.

Key Words: experiment • international trust • measurement of skill • natural science • repetition of experiments • writing conventions

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 31, No. 1, 71-85 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/030631201031001004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
W.-M. Roth
Radical Uncertainty in Scientific Discovery Work
Science Technology Human Values, May 1, 2009; 34(3): 313 - 336.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DISCOURSE & COMMUNICATIONHome page
A. Lischinsky
Examples as persuasive argument in popular management literature
Discourse & Communication, August 1, 2008; 2(3): 243 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
Wei Hong
Domination in a Scientific Field: Capital Struggle in a Chinese Isotope Lab
Social Studies of Science, August 1, 2008; 38(4): 543 - 570.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ind Corp ChangeHome page
M. Balconi, A. Pozzali, and R. Viale
The "codification debate" revisited: a conceptual framework to analyze the role of tacit knowledge in economics
Ind. Corp. Change, October 1, 2007; 16(5): 823 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
G. Downey
Producing Pain: Techniques and Technologies in No-Holds-Barred Fighting
Social Studies of Science, April 1, 2007; 37(2): 201 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
M. Ashmore
Magnum Opus: When Harry Met Joe, and What Follows
Social Studies of Science, February 1, 2007; 37(1): 159 - 166.
[PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
K. Vogel
Bioweapons Proliferation: Where Science Studies and Public Policy Collide
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2006; 36(5): 659 - 690.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
W.-M. Roth
Making Classifications (at) Work: Ordering Practices in Science
Social Studies of Science, August 1, 2005; 35(4): 581 - 621.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
C. C. M. Mody
The Sounds of Science: Listening to Laboratory Practice
Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 2005; 30(2): 175 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
D. Kaiser, K. Ito, and K. Hall
Spreading the Tools of Theory: Feynman Diagrams in the USA, Japan, and the Soviet Union
Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2004; 34(6): 879 - 922.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
S. S. Horning
Engineering the Performance: Recording Engineers, Tacit Knowledge and the Art of Controlling Sound
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2004; 34(5): 703 - 731.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Acta SociologicaHome page
J. Thurk and G. A. Fine
The Problem of Tools: Technology and the Sharing of Knowledge
Acta Sociologica, June 1, 2003; 46(2): 107 - 117.
[Abstract] [PDF]