This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Turner, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

What is the Problem with Experts?

Department of Philosophy, FAO 226, University of South Florida, 4202 Fowler Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33620-5550, USA; fax: +1 813 974 5914; turner{at}chuma.cas.usf.edu

The phenomenon of expertise produces two problems for liberal democratic theory: the first is whether it creates inequalities that undermine citizen rule or make it a sham; the second is whether the state can preserve its neutrality in liberal `government by discussion' while subsidizing, depending on, and giving special status to, the opinions of experts and scientists. A standard Foucauldian critique suggests that neutrality is impossible, expert power and state power are inseparable, and that expert power is the source of the oppressive, inegalitarian effects of present regimes. Habermas argues that expert cultures make democratic discussion impossible. Analogous problems arise with `cognitive authority', understood in Mertonian terms. Cognitive authority, as Merton sees it, allows us to ask about the democratic legitimacy of this authority, which appears to solve the problem (or part of the problem) because it returns ultimate `authority' to the people, who reject or accept the experts' claims. And many claims to expertise in fact do fail to gain acceptance. Through an examination of the type of expert that appears to evade the demands of legitimation, it is shown that expertise and liberal democracy can in principle co-exist, contrary to the claims of the critics.

Key Words: bureaucracy • constructionism • democracy • discretion • expertise • liberalism • science

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 31, No. 1, 123-149 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/030631201031001007


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Nunn A Network Model of Expertise Bulletin of Science Technology Society, October 1, 2008; 28(5): 414 - 427. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. S. Carolan Democratizing Knowledge: Sustainable and Conventional Agricultural Field Days as Divergent Democratic Forms Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2008; 33(4): 508 - 528. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. S. Grenier and M. Kehrhahn Toward an Integrated Model of Expertise Redevelopment and its Implications for HRD Human Resource Development Review, June 1, 2008; 7(2): 198 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Timmermans Professions and Their Work: Do Market Shelters Protect Professional Interests? Work and Occupations, May 1, 2008; 35(2): 164 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Blok, M. Jensen, and P. Kaltoft Social identities and risk: expert and lay imaginations on pesticide use. Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2008; 17(2): 189 - 209. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Durant Accounting for expertise: Wynne and the autonomy of the lay public actor Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2008; 17(1): 5 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Evans and A. Plows Listening Without Prejudice?: Re-discovering the Value of the Disinterested Citizen Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2007; 37(6): 827 - 853. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Webster Crossing Boundaries Social Science in the Policy Room Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 2007; 32(4): 458 - 478. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Kerr, S. Cunningham-Burley, and R. Tutton Shifting Subject Positions: Experts and Lay People in Public Dialogue Social Studies of Science, June 1, 2007; 37(3): 385 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Eisenhart The Humanist Scholar as Public Expert Written Communication, April 1, 2006; 23(2): 150 - 172. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Miah Genetics, cyberspace and bioethics: why not a public engagement with ethics? Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2005; 14(4): 409 - 421. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lahsen Technocracy, Democracy, and U.S. Climate Politics: The Need for Demarcations Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2005; 30(1): 137 - 169. [Abstract] [PDF]