Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thorpe, C.
Right arrow Articles by Shapin, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Who Was J. Robert Oppenheimer?

Charisma and Complex Organization

Charles Thorpe

Department of Sociology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0533, USA; fax: +1 858 534 4753; cthorpe{at}weber.ucsd.edu

Steven Shapin

Department of Sociology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0533, USA; fax: +1 858 534 4753; sshapin{at}ucsd.edu

Charismatic authority flourishes in places where some social scientists evidently do not expect to find it - in late modernity and in highly complex and instrumentally orientated technoscientific organizations. This paper documents and interprets participants' testimony about the workings of wartime Los Alamos in relation to the charisma of its Scientific Director, J. Robert Oppenheimer. We treat charisma as an interactional accomplishment, and examine its röle in technoscientific organizations. Los Alamos was a hybrid place, positioned at the intersection of military, industrial and academic forms. Everyday life there was marked by a high degree of normative uncertainty. Structures of authority, communication and the division of labour were contested and unclear. The interactional constitution of Oppenheimer as charismatic enabled him to articulate, vouch for and, finally, come to embody a conception of legitimate organizational order as collegial, egalitarian and communicatively open. We offer concluding speculations about the continuing importance of charismatic authority in contemporary technoscientific organizations. Just as normative uncertainty is endemic in late modernity, so too, we argue, is charisma.

Key Words: charismatic authority • leadership • military • science • technoscientific

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 30, No. 4, 545-590 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/030631200030004003


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
C. C. M. Mody
The Sounds of Science: Listening to Laboratory Practice
Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 2005; 30(2): 175 - 198.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
G. C. Bowker
Biodiversity Datadiversity
Social Studies of Science, October 1, 2000; 30(5): 643 - 683.
[Abstract] [PDF]