Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mody, C. C.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

`A New Way of Flying'

Différance, Rhetoric and the Autogiro in Interwar Aviation

Cyrus C.M. Mody

Department of Science and Technology Studies, Cornell University, 630 Clark Hall, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA; fax: +1 607 255 6044; ccm17{at}cornell.edu

The autogiro, a rotary-wing aircraft driven by a propeller, was created after World War I as a safe alternative to the airplane. Its resemblance to helicopters and airplanes made differentiating it an important rhetorical task for its supporters. With time, the autogiro took on new interpretations, and with them new processes of differentiation. The autogiro, airplane and helicopter all evolved, leading to instabilities of meaning, fixed temporarily by mechanisms of closure. I explore the relevance of Derridean différance for constructivist views of technology in tracing the flexible, differential meanings of the autogiro.

Key Words: closure • Derrida • difference • discourse • social construction • technology

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 30, No. 4, 513-543 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/030631200030004002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?