|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Making a Place for Science
The Field Trial
Christopher R. Henke
69 Hamilton Street, Hamilton, New York 13346, USA; fax: +1 315 824 0074; chenke{at}ucsd.edu
This paper explores the complex interaction between a group of University of California `farm advisors' and the farm community that they are meant to advise. In contrast with previous literature in science and technology studies (S&TS) on the distinctions between `laboratory science' and `field science', I show how advisors' work is a blend of these modes. More specifically, I focus on the advisors' use of `field trials' - field-based experiments conducted on growers' land - to convince their agricultural clientele to farm in a new way. Field trials retain some characteristics of lab science, such as control groups and special, experimental methods, but they are also solidly in the field, as they are often conducted on a grower's property, and the data from the experiment are a grower's crop. Drawing from my fieldwork with farm advisors and growers, I use the case of agricultural field trials to illustrate the role of `place' in applied science, highlight issues of `control' between scientists and their `public' in the field, and point to the challenges of producing consent through field trials.
Key Words: agriculture • cooperation and control • experiment • public science
Social Studies of Science, Vol. 30, No. 4,
483-511 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/030631200030004001
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
M. Lynch
Science as a Vacation: Deficits, Surfeits, PUSS, and Doing Your Own Job
Organization,
January 1, 2009;
16(1):
101 - 119.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Epstein
Culture and Science/Technology: Rethinking Knowledge, Power, Materiality, and Nature
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
September 1, 2008;
619(1):
165 - 182.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Lorimer
Counting Corncrakes: The Affective Science of the UK Corncrake Census
Social Studies of Science,
June 1, 2008;
38(3):
377 - 405.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Bonneuil, P.-B. Joly, and C. Marris
Disentrenching Experiment: The Construction of GM--Crop Field Trials As a Social Problem
Science Technology Human Values,
March 1, 2008;
33(2):
201 - 229.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Rees
Reflections on the Field: Primatology, Popular Science and the Politics of Personhood
Social Studies of Science,
December 1, 2007;
37(6):
881 - 907.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Downer
When the Chick Hits the Fan: Representativeness and Reproducibility in Technological Tests
Social Studies of Science,
February 1, 2007;
37(1):
7 - 26.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. R. Henke
Situation Normal? Repairing a Risky Ecology
Social Studies of Science,
February 1, 2007;
37(1):
135 - 142.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Bechky
Talking About Machines, Thick Description, and Knowledge Work
Organization Studies,
December 1, 2006;
27(12):
1757 - 1768.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. F. Gieryn
City as Truth-Spot: Laboratories and Field-Sites in Urban Studies
Social Studies of Science,
February 1, 2006;
36(1):
5 - 38.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J. Hackett
Introduction to the Special Guest-Edited Issue on Scientific Collaboration
Social Studies of Science,
October 1, 2005;
35(5):
667 - 671.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Shrum
Reagency of the Internet, or, How I Became a Guest for Science
Social Studies of Science,
October 1, 2005;
35(5):
723 - 754.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Tuunainen
Contesting a Hybrid Firm at a Traditional University
Social Studies of Science,
April 1, 2005;
35(2):
173 - 210.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
