Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Timmermans, S.
Right arrow Articles by Leiter, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Redemption of Thalidomide:

Standardizing the Risk of Birth Defects

Stefan Timmermans

Sociology Department, MS 071, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 12454-9110, USA; fax: +1 781 736 2653; Timmermans{at}brandeis.edu

Valerie Leiter

Sociology Department, MS 071, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 12454-9110, USA; fax: +1 781 736 2653; Leiter{at}brandeis.edu

In this paper we examine how a standardized drug distribution system contributed to a therapeutic and symbolic make-over of thalidomide. In the 1960s, thalidomide was seen as a horror drug that caused severe birth defects among over 10,000 babies who were exposed to it in utero. Currently, thalidomide is viewed as a potentially life-saving drug which is being distributed in the USA. We discuss this transformation from a social worlds perspective, showing how the standardized drug distribution system normalized the risk of foetal birth defects, while preserving the autonomy of health care professionals. The distribution system accomplished this transformation by focusing on the risk associated with female reproductive behaviour, and by providing close reproductive surveillance of female patients. This standardized system solidified social inequalities and professional power relationships, revealing assumptions about trust, responsibility and risk.

Key Words: drugs • normalization • risk • social worlds • standardization • technology

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 30, No. 1, 41-71 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/030631200030001002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Social Studies of ScienceHome page
K. Joyce
Appealing Images: Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Production of Authoritative Knowledge
Social Studies of Science, June 1, 2005; 35(3): 437 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Men and MasculinitiesHome page
N. Oudshoorn
"Astronauts in the Sperm World": The Renegotiation of Masculine Identities in Discourses on Male Contraceptives
Men and Masculinities, April 1, 2004; 6(4): 349 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]