Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bloor, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The South Wales Miners Federation, Miners' Lung and the Instrumental Use of Expertise, 1900-1950

Michael Bloor

School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, 50 Park Place, Cardiff CF1 3AT, Wales, UK; fax +44 29 20874175; Bloor{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Oral history materials from the South Wales Miners' Library are used to examine the communal understandings of, and collective responses to, the scourge of Miners' Lung (pneumoconiosis) in the 1920s and 1930s. Lay epidemiology in mining communities attributed an aetiological rôle to coaldust at a time when many experts believed miners' pulmonary disease to be bronchitic, or to be silica-induced. In their efforts to secure compensation claims for their members, union officials instrumentally used scientific expertise in a variety of forms: they contributed to epidemiological evidence; they lobbied for more government-funded research; they `bought' experts; they duped expert witnesses; and they made sophisticated instrumental appeals to the supposed independence of favourable expert judgements. Eventually, miners' situated `local knowledge' became scientific orthodoxy, a success story which may be associated with the class-conscious miners' `bump of irreverence' about expert knowledge, and with the divided character of the expert core-set, sections of which were receptive to miners' `local knowledge' claims.

Key Words: core set • lay expertise • occupational health • pneumoconiosis • popular epidemiology

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 30, No. 1, 125-140 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/030631200030001005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
P. L. Younger
Environmental impacts of coal mining and associated wastes: a geochemical perspective
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2004; 236(1): 169 - 209.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
M. Bloor
No Longer Dying for a Living: Collective Responses to Injury Risks in South Wales Mining Communities, 1900-47
Sociology, February 1, 2002; 36(1): 89 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]