Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sims, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Concrete Practices

Testing in an Earthquake-Engineering Laboratory

Benjamin Sims

138 Trilobite Trail, Jemez Springs, New Mexico 87025, USA; bsims{at}ucsd.edu

Successful testing depends upon projecting from a test situation to the performance of a technology under working conditions. Some have argued that projection is made possible primarily through a collective agreement that the test circumstances and working conditions are similar in crucial ways. This paper argues that projection is better understood in many cases as a set of local practices through which testing produces change in a wider context of technology use. In the earthquake-engineering laboratory described here, this connection depends upon the circulation of skilled people, material objects and symbolic representations across distinct work settings, in such a way as to construct a continuous `chain of practices' between the laboratory and the worlds of construction, academia and design engineering. This analysis highlights the importance of the division of labour in shaping technical practice both inside and outside the laboratory.

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 29, No. 4, 483-518 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/030631299029004002
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 OrganizationHome page
R. Zeiss and P. Groenewegen
Engaging Boundary Objects in OMS and STS? Exploring the Subtleties of Layered Engagement
Organization, January 1, 2009; 16(1): 81 - 100.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Science Technology Human ValuesHome page
A. Beaulieu, A. Scharnhorst, and P. Wouters
Not Another Case Study: A Middle-Range Interrogation of Ethnographic Case Studies in the Exploration of E-science
Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2007; 32(6): 672 - 692.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Studies of ScienceHome page
J. Downer
When the Chick Hits the Fan: Representativeness and Reproducibility in Technological Tests
Social Studies of Science, February 1, 2007; 37(1): 7 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Social Studies of ScienceHome page
B. Sims
Safe Science: Material and Social Order in Laboratory Work
Social Studies of Science, June 1, 2005; 35(3): 333 - 366.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 OrganizationHome page
L. Suchman
Organizing Alignment: A Case of Bridge-Building
Organization, May 1, 2000; 7(2): 311 - 327.
[Abstract] [PDF]