This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Collins, H. M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Certainty and the Public Understanding of Science: Science on Television1

Science Studies Centre, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.

The notion of `the public understanding of science' is ambiguous. It is not the findings of science that are crucial, but the public understanding of science as a knowledge-producing activity. Two television broadcasts on science are described and analyzed. Features typical of science broadcasting, with their implicit epistemological messages, are discussed. The public understanding of science is affected by the way such programmes portray science as a producer of certainty. The first programme deals with a controversy in an area of low status. While this allows an uncertain face of science to be glimpsed, it is with us only for a narrow slot in time — the present. We are shown only a small `window of uncertainty' set within walls of certainty that extend into the past and the future. The second programme confirms this analysis. The first programme puts us in a position to follow the window of uncertainty in real time. An experiment discussed in the programme — the carbon-dating test on the Shroud of Turin — is about to happen. It is predicted that the carbon-dating test will move into the `window of uncertainty' as we approach it.

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 17, No. 4, 689-713 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/030631287017004005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. F. E. Ebeling Mediating Uncertainty: Communicating the Financial Risks of Nanotechnologies Science Communication, March 1, 2008; 29(3): 335 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Heath and D. vom Lehn Configuring 'Interactivity': Enhancing Engagement in Science Centres and Museums Social Studies of Science, February 1, 2008; 38(1): 63 - 91. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. C. Nisbet and R. K. Goidel Understanding citizen perceptions of science controversy: bridging the ethnographic survey research divide Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2007; 16(4): 421 - 440. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Cassidy Popular evolutionary psychology in the UK: an unusual case of science in the media? Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2005; 14(2): 115 - 141. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Reed (Un-)Professional discourse?: Journalists' and scientists' stories about science in the media Journalism, December 1, 2001; 2(3): 279 - 298. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. F. WEIGOLD Communicating Science: A Review of the Literature Science Communication, December 1, 2001; 23(2): 164 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. C. Zehr Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2000; 9(2): 85 - 103. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Edmond and D. Mercer Creating (public) science in the Noah's Ark case Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 1999; 8(4): 317 - 343. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Locke Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 1999; 8(2): 75 - 92. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Oudshoorn On Masculinities, Technologies, and Pain: The Testing of Male Contraceptives in the Clinic and the Media Science Technology Human Values, April 1, 1999; 24(2): 265 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Michael Between citizen and consumer: multiplying the meanings of the "public understanding of science" Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 1998; 7(4): 313 - 327. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Michael, A. Grinyer, and J. Turner Teaching biotechnology: identity in the context of ignorance and knowledgeability Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 1997; 6(1): 1 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bucchi When scientists turn to the public: alternative routes in science communication Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 1996; 5(4): 375 - 394. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Long and J. Steinke The thrill of everyday science: images of science and scientists on children's educational science programmes in the United States Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 1996; 5(2): 101 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Epstein The Construction of Lay Expertise: AIDS Activism and the Forging of Credibility in the Reform of Clinical Trials Science Technology Human Values, October 1, 1995; 20(4): 408 - 437. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Miller Introducing the `gay gene': media and scientific representations Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 1995; 4(3): 269 - 284. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. L. Sullivan Exclusionary Epideictic: NOVA's Narrative Excommunication of Fleischmann and Pons Science Technology Human Values, July 1, 1994; 19(3): 283 - 306. [Abstract] [PDF]

				W. E. Bijker Do Not Despair: There Is Life after Constructivism Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 1993; 18(1): 113 - 138. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Wynne Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science Public Understanding of Science, July 1, 1992; 1(3): 281 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Jasanoff Cross-National Differences in Policy Implementation Eval Rev, January 1, 1991; 15(1): 103 - 119. [Abstract] [PDF]