This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Clemens, E. S. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Of Asteroids and Dinosaurs: The Role of the Press in the Shaping of Scientific Debate

Department of Sociology, The University of Chicago, 1126 East 59th Street, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

Since 1980, catastrophist theories of extinction have experienced a dramatic renaissance, based on the claim that important biological changes have extraterrestrial causes - that asteroids or comets were responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs, as well as a host of lesser-known creatures. Formerly relegated to the periphery of evolutionary biology and paleontology, the search for evidence of extraterrestrially instigated extinctions has become a well-funded and rapidly developing area of research, involving scientists from a wide variety of disciplines. In large part, the rapid establishment and diffusion of the `impact' or `asteroid' hypothesis may be attributed to the ways in which the style of the argument, as well as the institutional location of its proponents, has interacted with the system of scientific publication, both professional and popular. Through an analysis of the organization of publication and its relationship to various ideals concerning evidence, argument and `good science', some of the consequences of the organization of communication for the development of scientific thought are suggested.

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 16, No. 3, 421-456 (1986)
DOI: 10.1177/030631286016003002


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. M. Bowman, G. A. Hodge, and P. Binks Are We Really the Prey? Nanotechnology as Science and Science Fiction Bulletin of Science Technology Society, December 1, 2007; 27(6): 435 - 445. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Rees Reflections on the Field: Primatology, Popular Science and the Politics of Personhood Social Studies of Science, December 1, 2007; 37(6): 881 - 907. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Mellor Colliding Worlds: Asteroid Research and the Legitimization of War in Space Social Studies of Science, August 1, 2007; 37(4): 499 - 531. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Cassidy Evolutionary psychology as public science and boundary work Public Understanding of Science, April 1, 2006; 15(2): 175 - 205. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bucchi and R. G. Mazzolini Big science, little news: science coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946-1997 Public Understanding of Science, January 1, 2003; 12(1): 7 - 24. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Neresini And man descended from the sheep: the public debate on cloning in the Italian press Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 2000; 9(4): 359 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. A. T. EYCK Shaping a Food Safety Debate: Control Efforts of Newspaper Reporters and Sources in the Food Irradiation Controversy Science Communication, June 1, 1999; 20(4): 426 - 447. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Bucchi When scientists turn to the public: alternative routes in science communication Public Understanding of Science, October 1, 1996; 5(4): 375 - 394. [Abstract] [PDF]