This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Brannigan, A. Articles by Wanner, R. A. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Historical Distributions of Multiple Discoveries and Theories of Scientific Change

Department of Sociology, The University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4.

Richard A. Wanner

Department of Sociology, The University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4.

After discussing the issues of validity and reliability in the measurement of multiple discoveries and their implications for testing alternative theories, we examine the mathematical assumptions underlying the Poisson distribution, and their correspondence to the theories. We find that a negatively contagious Poisson distribution is equally consistent with the observed distribution of grade of multiples, and since its basic assumptions are more consistent with our understanding of the discovery process, there are ample grounds for rejecting the alternative `chance' theory advanced by Simonton, among others. Lastly, we explore some elements of the Zeitgeist theory which appear to provide a more plausible interpretation of the phenomena, particularly regarding the role of communication in modern science, and report some findings in support of this approach.

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, 417-435 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/030631283013003004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?