Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Social Studies of Science
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kern, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Hinshaw, V. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Scientists' Understanding of Propositional Logic: An Experimental Investigation

Leslie H. Kern

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 164 West 19th Avenue, Clombus, Ohio 43210,USA

Herbert L. Mirels

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 164 West 19th Avenue, Clombus, Ohio 43210,USA

Virgil G. Hinshaw

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 164 West 19th Avenue, Clombus, Ohio 43210,USA

Seventy-two scientists (psychologists, biologists, and physicists) from a large US midwestern state university completed a questionnaire designed to assess understanding of the principles of formal logic believed by philosophers of science to be essential to theory and hypothesis testing. The questionnaire, in a multiple-choice format, required solutions to problems presented in either abstract (symbolic) or concrete (specific example) terms. Across academic disciplines the participants' performance reflected substantial deficits in the appreciation of straightforward logical propositions. For example, nearly half of the scientists failed to recognize the logical validity of modus tollens, an inferential rule of propositional logic which, from a strictly normative standpoint, has been depicted as the only form of valid conclusive inference in theory and hypothesis testing. The pivotal role of formal logic in philosophical analyses of scientific inference is questioned on empirical grounds.

Social Studies of Science, Vol. 13, No. 1, 131-146 (1983)
DOI: 10.1177/030631283013001007


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Black PsychologyHome page
W. I. Smith and S. T. Drumming
On the Strategies that Blacks Employ in Deductive Reasoning
Journal of Black Psychology, February 1, 1989; 16(1): 1 - 22.
[Abstract]


Home page
Science CommunicationHome page
R. A. Neimeyer and W. R. Shadish JR
Optimizing Scientific Validity: Toward an Interdisciplinary Science Studies
Science Communication, March 1, 1987; 8(3): 463 - 485.
[Abstract]