| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Scientists' Understanding of Propositional Logic: An Experimental InvestigationDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 164 West 19th Avenue, Clombus, Ohio 43210,USA
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 164 West 19th Avenue, Clombus, Ohio 43210,USA
Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 164 West 19th Avenue, Clombus, Ohio 43210,USA Seventy-two scientists (psychologists, biologists, and physicists) from a large US midwestern state university completed a questionnaire designed to assess understanding of the principles of formal logic believed by philosophers of science to be essential to theory and hypothesis testing. The questionnaire, in a multiple-choice format, required solutions to problems presented in either abstract (symbolic) or concrete (specific example) terms. Across academic disciplines the participants' performance reflected substantial deficits in the appreciation of straightforward logical propositions. For example, nearly half of the scientists failed to recognize the logical validity of modus tollens, an inferential rule of propositional logic which, from a strictly normative standpoint, has been depicted as the only form of valid conclusive inference in theory and hypothesis testing. The pivotal role of formal logic in philosophical analyses of scientific inference is questioned on empirical grounds.
Social Studies of Science, Vol. 13, No. 1,
131-146 (1983) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||

